Friends Only
![]() |
follow indie_young at http://twitter.com
Sorry I know it's annoying but I'm paranoid right now. Comment and I will add you, unless I have a good reason not to.
![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
![]() |
Should a Government be granted the right to supress expressions of thought (i.e. any form of media) of it's people, because it may lead to harmfull or illegal actions?
Does the embraceing of freedom and individual thought ultimately mean an end to morality as we know it in societey?
Yes![]()
![]()
4 (21.1%)
No![]()
![]()
14 (73.7%)
Again I must say - Huh?![]()
![]()
0 (0.0%)
Again, too complex! (Explain!)![]()
![]()
1 (5.3%)
Assumeing the answer to the above question is "Yes", can morals really be morals if their exsistence supresses human nature?
But the answer to the above is - No.![]()
![]()
8 (44.4%)
It's a long religious answer - (ah that I don't know the answer to, feel free to explain in a comment)![]()
![]()
0 (0.0%)
This is a question on the nature of humanity.![]()
![]()
2 (11.1%)
This is a question on what qualifies as moral.![]()
![]()
3 (16.7%)
No.![]()
![]()
3 (16.7%)
Yes.![]()
![]()
2 (11.1%)
Is trying to keep morals as they are now not only limiting to the human experience but supressing the change of societey
Yes![]()
![]()
15 (78.9%)
No![]()
![]()
2 (10.5%)
GAH! I give up, I'm just gonna make a hella long comment![]()
![]()
0 (0.0%)
The above answer but I'm too lazy/tired/busy to actually write a comment![]()
![]()
2 (10.5%)
Assumeing the answer to the above is 'Yes', is it selfish to try and preserve, or pause, morality as it stands now?
If each individual is left to their own idea and expression what's to stop chaos?
Nothing, that's why it's a bad idea.![]()
![]()
2 (10.5%)
Nothing, that's why it fantastic!![]()
![]()
2 (10.5%)
Humanity itself, man came together and made societey to begin with, I'm sure we'll be fine.![]()
![]()
7 (36.8%)
A government that catters TO humanity instead of trying to supress it.![]()
![]()
4 (21.1%)
Other![]()
![]()
4 (21.1%)
Is freethought and expression if left unchecked going to move humanity backwards or forwards?
Backwards, without rules and morals we'll go back to living as cavepeople![]()
![]()
2 (10.5%)
Forward, the acceptance of human nature along with advancements in technology and intelligence can only be good for humanity.![]()
![]()
12 (63.2%)
It depends.![]()
![]()
4 (21.1%)
Other.![]()
![]()
1 (5.3%)
Can morality and free thought/expression exsist together? Or does the exsistence of both have to be in direct conflict?
Uhhh, hello? There have been tons of religious and moral artists/writers/thinkers, so yes the two can exsist together, and in fact compliment each other.![]()
![]()
14 (73.7%)
No, they can't exsist together so long as morality teaches to supress any part of human desire and instinct.![]()
![]()
4 (21.1%)
Other![]()
![]()
1 (5.3%)
Do you view a governments job as preserveing the morality of it's people?
Do you view a governments job as preserveing the thoughts and expressions of its people?
If a governments job is to protect both, should one be valued above another?
Yes - morality over thoughts and expressions![]()
![]()
1 (5.3%)
Yes - thoughts and expressions over morality![]()
![]()
2 (10.5%)
No - they should be treated equally![]()
![]()
4 (21.1%)
No - a governments job is not to protect both but one![]()
![]()
5 (26.3%)
No - a goverments job is to protect neither![]()
![]()
7 (36.8%)
Can societey function without morals?
Yes, and ultimately it would be better![]()
![]()
2 (10.5%)
Yes, but it wouldn't be good![]()
![]()
4 (21.1%)
No, without morals societey would crumble![]()
![]()
5 (26.3%)
Other.![]()
![]()
8 (42.1%)
Can societey function without free thought and expression?
Yes, and it would be better because there would be far less desputes![]()
![]()
0 (0.0%)
Yes, but it wouldn't be good, dictatorship anyone?![]()
![]()
10 (52.6%)
No, societey must have thought and expression to move it forward and keep it full of life![]()
![]()
8 (42.1%)
Other.![]()
![]()
1 (5.3%)
Given all of this, which is more important for our societey, Morals or Freedom?
Morals![]()
![]()
0 (0.0%)
Freedom![]()
![]()
8 (42.1%)
A happy medium![]()
![]()
5 (26.3%)
Other![]()
![]()
5 (26.3%)
I'm so f***ing confused now!![]()
![]()
1 (5.3%)
Do you consider yourself:
Conservative![]()
![]()
2 (11.1%)
Moderate - more Conservative than Liberal![]()
![]()
1 (5.6%)
Moderate - Even Split![]()
![]()
2 (11.1%)
Moderate - more Liberal than Conservative![]()
![]()
4 (22.2%)
Liberal![]()
![]()
9 (50.0%)













